
Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
508 U.S. 49 (1993)
Relevant factsFree
Columbia Pictures and other studios (plaintiffs) sued PRE (defendant), a hotel operator renting movie videodiscs to guests, for copyright infringement; PRE counterclaimed that the suit itself was sham litigation intended to restrain competition and thus outside Noerr-Pennington antitrust immunity, but the courts below found the studios had probable cause for their copyright claim and granted the studios summary judgment on the antitrust counterclaim.
IssueFree
Whether a group of competitors may bring litigation without losing antitrust immunity under the Noerr doctrine.
Related cases
Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association v. United States268 U.S. 563 (1925)Town of Hallie v. City of Eau Claire471 U.S. 34 (1985)Timberlane Lumber Co. v. Bank of America, N.T. & S.A.459 F.2d 597 (1976)California Retail Liquor Dealers Association v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc.445 U.S. 97 (1980)Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.499 U.S. 365 (1991)