Pierce County, Washington v. Guillen
United States Supreme Court
537 U.S. 129 (2003)
To encourage candid state reporting of dangerous roads for federal safety funding, Congress made materials collected under the Hazard Elimination Program non-discoverable in court proceedings; after Guillen's (plaintiff) wife was killed at a Pierce County, Washington (defendant) intersection previously flagged as hazardous, Guillen sought to introduce evidence of Washington's failure to fix the intersection in a wrongful-death suit. Washington moved to exclude that evidence under the federal discovery bar, and the Washington Supreme Court held Congress had exceeded its Commerce Clause power in enacting that bar; the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Whether Congress may regulate roads and highways, including barring discovery of federally collected hazard information, under its power to regulate the instrumentalities and channels of commerce.