Lawwly

Pegram v. Herdrich

United States Supreme Court

530 U.S. 211 (2000)

Relevant factsFree

Carle Clinic Association (defendant), a physician-owned HMO, employed Dr. Lori Pegram (defendant), who examined patient Cynthia Herdrich (plaintiff) for groin pain and, upon discovering an abdominal mass, decided Herdrich should wait eight days for an ultrasound at a distant Carle facility rather than ordering one immediately despite noticeable inflammation; before the eight days passed, Herdrich's appendix ruptured, causing peritonitis. Herdrich sued for medical malpractice and later added an ERISA breach-of-fiduciary-duty claim, alleging Carle's physician-ownership structure incentivized decisions maximizing profit over patient care; after a jury found for Herdrich on the malpractice claims, the ERISA claim's dismissal was reversed by an intermediate appellate court, prompting Carle and Pegram's Supreme Court appeal.

IssueFree

Whether an HMO physician's mixed decision about whether a patient's condition warrants immediate diagnostic treatment, which simultaneously determines plan coverage eligibility, constitutes a fiduciary act subject to ERISA's fiduciary duty requirements.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases