Lawwly

Patents for MPEG-2 Technology

United States Department of Justice

1997 WL 356954

Relevant factsFree

Owners of patents essential to the MPEG-2 compression standard agreed to pool their patents under an administrator that would grant non-discriminatory licenses, collect and distribute royalties under a most-favored-nation clause, and require licensees to grant back licenses on any additional essential patents; an independent expert continuously reviewed the pool to ensure it included only genuinely essential (complementary, non-competing) patents, individual owners could still license their own patents separately, and licensees remained free to develop competing alternative technologies. The owners requested a DOJ business review letter regarding antitrust enforcement.

IssueFree

Whether a patent pool combining multiple complementary patents into a single licensable portfolio violates antitrust laws if the pool is not anticompetitive.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases