Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.
Delaware Supreme Court
637 A.2d 34 (Del. 1994)
Relevant factsFree
Paramount's original and amended merger agreements with Viacom retained a no-shop clause, a $100 million termination fee, and a stock-option provision letting Viacom buy roughly 19.9% of Paramount stock if the deal failed, even as QVC repeatedly matched and exceeded Viacom's per-share offers; the Paramount board ultimately favored the Viacom deal without modifying these defensive measures despite QVC's persistently higher bids.
IssueFree
Whether a no-shop provision in a merger agreement between two corporations may define or limit the fiduciary duties of the directors of one or both of the corporations.
Related cases
Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.650 A.2d 1270 (1994)In re Worlds of Wonder Securities Litigation35 F.3d 1407 (1994)In re Short170 B.R. 128 (1994)Donohoe v. Consolidated Operating & Production Corp.30 F.3d 907 (7th Cir. 1994)International Union, United Mine Workers v. Bagwell512 U.S. 821 (1994)