Ohio v. Robinette
United States Supreme Court
519 U.S. 33 (1996)
Relevant factsFree
After stopping Robinette (defendant) for speeding and confirming his license was clean, an officer issued a verbal warning, returned his license, and immediately asked if he had drugs in the car; Robinette said no and consented to a search, which turned up drugs. Robinette argued the search violated the Fourth Amendment because he did not know he was free to leave once his license was returned, and the Ohio Supreme Court agreed, requiring an express advisement that the detainee is free to go; the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.
IssueFree
Whether an express indication from a detaining officer that the detainee is free to go is a prerequisite to a voluntary consent to further interrogation.