Lawwly

Oglebay Norton Co. v. Armco, Inc.

Supreme Court of Ohio

556 N.E.2d 515 (1990)

Relevant factsFree

Oglebay Norton (plaintiff) and Armco (defendant) operated under a decades-long shipping contract, periodically extended through 2010, in which Oglebay handled all of Armco's Great Lakes iron ore shipping needs in exchange for a rate tied to market pricing factors; after those market rates stopped being publicly available in the mid-1980s, the parties managed one further mutually agreed rate in 1984 but then reached an impasse. Oglebay sought a declaratory judgment to set the rate while the parties continued performing under the contract, and Armco counterclaimed that the contract was no longer enforceable at all; the trial court, relying on evidence of the parties' long business relationship, intent to remain bound, and industry rate ranges, set a 1986 rate of $6.25 and ordered future rates determined by negotiation or mediation through 2010, a ruling an intermediate appellate court affirmed before Ohio's Supreme Court took up the case.

IssueFree

Whether a long-term contract becomes unenforceable once its pricing mechanism becomes indefinite due to changed market conditions, where the parties have continued performing and show clear intent to remain bound.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases