Lawwly

Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

763 F.3d 1171 (2014)

Relevant factsFree

Kevin Nguyen (plaintiff) bought two discounted Hewlett-Packard Touchpad tablets from the Barnes & Noble (defendant) website, only to have his order cancelled the next day due to high demand; he sued for deceptive trade practices and false advertising. Barnes & Noble moved to compel arbitration, arguing Nguyen was bound by its Terms of Use (TOU), accessible via a hyperlink at the bottom of every webpage, which purported to bind any visitor, account creator, or purchaser to arbitration — even though Nguyen had never clicked the hyperlink or read the TOU. The district court denied the motion to compel arbitration, and Barnes & Noble appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a website user has sufficient constructive notice of terms of use, and is thereby bound to an arbitration clause within them, when the terms are accessible only via a hyperlink on every webpage but the site otherwise gives no notice and requires no affirmative act of assent.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases