Morrison v. Olson
United States Supreme Court
487 U.S. 654 (1988)
Under the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, a court-like body called the Special Division could appoint an independent counsel, removable only by the Attorney General for good cause, to investigate and prosecute high-ranking officials; Independent Counsel Alexia Morrison (plaintiff) investigated alleged obstruction and false testimony by Justice Department officials including Solicitor General Ted Olson (defendant). When Olson moved to quash Morrison's subpoenas as unconstitutional, the district court denied the motion and upheld the Act, but a divided court of appeals reversed, finding an independent counsel was a "principal" rather than "inferior" officer improperly appointed outside the Appointments Clause; Morrison appealed.
Whether a law vesting the judiciary with the power to appoint an inferior executive officer (an independent counsel) and prohibiting the Attorney General from removing the officer without good cause violates separation-of-powers principles.