Lawwly

Montana v. United States

United States Supreme Court

440 U.S. 147 (1979)

Relevant factsFree

The federal government sued Montana (defendant, here treated as plaintiff-appellee's opposing party) challenging the constitutionality of Montana's 1 percent gross-receipts tax on public-project contractors, a tax that did not apply to purely private contractors. A nearly identical challenge had already been litigated in state court by federal contractor Kiewit, in which the Montana Supreme Court upheld the tax; the federal government, though not a formal party, had reviewed and approved Kiewit's complaint, paid its attorneys' fees, and submitted briefs in that litigation. After Kiewit's follow-up suit for related refunds was dismissed on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds, a three-judge federal panel in this separate case concluded Kiewit was not binding on the government and struck down the tax as unconstitutional; Montana appealed.

IssueFree

Whether preclusion is appropriate when successive litigations challenge the same issue of law.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases