Miller v. Johnson
United States Supreme Court
515 U.S. 900 (1995)
After the Department of Justice rejected Georgia's (defendant) first two congressional redistricting plans for creating only two majority-minority districts, the state adopted a third plan modeled on an ACLU proposal that split more than two dozen counties and the city of Savannah to create three majority African-American districts, which the Department approved; African-American candidates won each of those three districts in the next election. A group of white voters (plaintiffs) from one of the new districts sued, arguing the plan's boundaries could only be explained by an intent to sort voters by race, and the district court agreed, finding race the plan's primary and nearly exclusive motivation.
Whether an electoral redistricting plan that establishes the geographical boundaries of voting districts for the primary purpose of segregating voters according to race violates the Fourteenth Amendment.