MHANY Management, Inc. v. County of Nassau
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
819 F.3d 581 (2016)
Nassau County (defendant) planned to sell two properties in Garden City, a community with little affordable housing and few minority residents, and proposed zoning them for multi-family residential use (R-M), which would have allowed affordable housing. Garden City residents objected, citing traffic and a desire to preserve single-family neighborhood 'character,' and the town quickly adopted a new residential-townhouse (R-T) zoning category instead. Under the accepted R-T bid, MHANY Management (plaintiff) concluded it would be financially impossible to build affordable housing, while its own proposals under the original R-M zoning would have included at least 15 percent affordable units and, according to expert testimony, attracted a renter pool 18 to 32 percent minority — compared to only three to six minority households able to afford homes under the R-T zoning actually adopted. MHANY sued, alleging the rezoning violated the Fair Housing Act through both disparate treatment and disparate impact. The district court ruled for MHANY, and Nassau County appealed.
Whether the Fair Housing Act prohibits a zoning decision motivated by discriminatory intent or having a disparate impact on minorities, even when adopted in response to a majority of residents' stated preferences.