Lawwly

McKenna v. Straughan

California Court of Appeal

222 Cal. Rptr. 462 (1986)

Relevant factsFree

Despite Cherie Straughan's serious drinking problem and history of drunk driving — including eight failed stints in recovery homes — her parents (defendants) loaned her money to buy a car; ten days later, driving drunk on the wrong side of the road, she hit her hairdresser Pamela McKenna (plaintiff) head-on. McKenna, who saw Cherie weekly and had personally urged the Straughans not to buy her another car (comparing it to "giving a six-year-old a loaded gun"), sued the Straughans for negligent entrustment; the trial court granted the Straughans summary judgment, reasoning they never actually owned or controlled the car and therefore never "entrusted" it. McKenna appealed.

IssueFree

Whether providing funds for an unfit driver to buy a car imposes liability for negligent entrustment.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases