Mayer v. Petzelt
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
311 F.2d 601 (1962)
Officer Petzelt (defendant) of the Crystal Lake police pulled over Mayer (plaintiff) for a traffic violation; sixty-four-year-old Mayer, recalling a past altercation in which Petzelt had roughly detained him for 'telling a lie,' fled, fell, and was injured. That prior altercation was excluded from evidence at trial. In a first trial, the jury found for Mayer for $25,000, but Petzelt won a new trial. In the second trial, the jury returned a general verdict for Mayer on liability but, in a special interrogatory, also found Mayer did not exercise due care for his own safety; the district court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n.o.v.) for Petzelt based on that inconsistency.
Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49, a judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be entered when the jury's special-interrogatory answers appear inconsistent with its general verdict.