Lawwly

Mayer v. Petzelt

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

311 F.2d 601 (1962)

Relevant factsFree

Officer Petzelt (defendant) of the Crystal Lake police pulled over Mayer (plaintiff) for a traffic violation; sixty-four-year-old Mayer, recalling a past altercation in which Petzelt had roughly detained him for 'telling a lie,' fled, fell, and was injured. That prior altercation was excluded from evidence at trial. In a first trial, the jury found for Mayer for $25,000, but Petzelt won a new trial. In the second trial, the jury returned a general verdict for Mayer on liability but, in a special interrogatory, also found Mayer did not exercise due care for his own safety; the district court entered judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n.o.v.) for Petzelt based on that inconsistency.

IssueFree

Whether, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 49, a judgment notwithstanding the verdict should be entered when the jury's special-interrogatory answers appear inconsistent with its general verdict.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases