Mastrobuono v. Shearson Lehman Hutton, Inc.
United States Supreme Court
514 U.S. 52 (1995)
Relevant factsFree
Antonio Mastrobuono (plaintiff) opened a brokerage account with Shearson Lehman Hutton (defendant) under a Client Agreement providing that disputes would be arbitrated under New York law and NASD rules; Mastrobuono later brought a claim that was arbitrated in his favor, with the arbitrators awarding both actual and punitive damages. Shearson appealed, arguing New York law prohibited punitive damages in arbitration, and the court of appeals agreed with Shearson, prompting Mastrobuono to seek certiorari.
IssueFree
Whether federal policy favoring arbitration will prevail when an ambiguity exists in an arbitration clause.
Related cases
New York State Conference of Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers Insurance Co.514 U.S. 645 (1995)Coursey v. Caterpillar, Inc.64 F.3d 662 (1995) (Unpublished)Hubbard v. Utz Quality Foods, Inc.903 F.Supp. 444 (1995)KGM Harvesting Co. v. Fresh Network36 Cal. App. 4th 376 (1995)Kansas Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company, Inc. v. Farmway Credit Union256 Kan. 968 (1995)