Maple Flooring Manufacturers Association v. United States
United States Supreme Court
268 U.S. 563 (1925)
Relevant factsFree
MFMA (defendant), a trade association of 22 wood-flooring companies producing 70 percent of U.S. wood flooring, distributed average product costs and standard freight rates among members and held meetings to discuss industry conditions, without any evidence members agreed to fix prices or production; the government (plaintiff) sued, alleging this information-sharing amounted to an antitrust conspiracy, and the district court found for the government, holding the practices likely reduced competition.
IssueFree
Whether competitors may meet for the purpose of exchanging information about products and market conditions without violating antitrust law.