Lawwly

M & T Mortgage Corp. v. White

United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York

736 F. Supp. 2d 538 (2010)

Relevant factsFree

Leo White and Linda and Kimberly Council (plaintiffs), all African American first-time property buyers seeking low-income rental investments who qualified for financing, sued M & T Mortgage and the sellers/lenders of two properties they purchased, discovering afterward the properties were in such disrepair they couldn't attract tenants; M & T itself wasn't named in the specific count alleging the seller and lender violated the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA). A magistrate judge found the seller and lender concentrated their activities in predominantly minority neighborhoods, but it remained unclear whether they intentionally targeted minority buyers or intentionally misrepresented the properties' condition or value; the district court adopted these findings and considered the magistrate's recommendation to deny summary judgment and proceed to trial.

IssueFree

Whether federal legislation prohibits unfair housing and lending practices targeted at members of protected classes.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases