Lawwly

Loughan v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

749 F.2d 1519 (11th Cir. 1985)

Relevant factsFree

Loughan (plaintiff), a mechanic injured by a defective rim-wheel assembly, sued manufacturer Firestone (defendant) for products liability; Firestone sought to introduce evidence, outside the jury's presence, that Loughan regularly kept beer on the job and drank while working over several years, corroborated by two former supervisors, one of whom had fired Loughan years earlier for on-the-job drinking after customer complaints. The district court admitted this evidence as habit evidence, and the jury found for Firestone; Loughan appealed.

IssueFree

Whether evidence of a person's behavior can be admissible to prove that the person acted in conformity with a habit if the behavior is the person's regular response to a specific situation repeated over an extended period of time.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases