Lawwly

Lick Mill Creek Apartments v. Chicago Title Insurance Co.

Court of Appeal of California, Sixth District

283 Cal. Rptr. 231 (1991)

Relevant factsFree

Lick Mill Creek Apartments (plaintiff) bought previously contaminated commercial land in 1986 and purchased title insurance from Chicago Title Insurance (defendant), which had surveyed the land and noted pipes, tanks, and pumps but issued a policy covering loss from unmarketability of title and encumbrances. Because state and federal law made subsequent purchasers responsible for hazardous-material cleanup, Lick Mill spent money removing the contamination and sought reimbursement from Chicago Title, which denied the claim; the trial court sustained a demurrer against Lick Mill's complaint, and Lick Mill appealed.

IssueFree

Whether an insurance policy which protects against nonmarketability of title and against encumbrances is obligated to reimburse costs associated with removal of hazardous material.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases