Lawwly

Lamar Corp. v. City of Twin Falls

Idaho Supreme Court

981 P.2d 1146 (1999)

Relevant factsFree

The City of Twin Falls (defendant) adopted a Comprehensive Plan designating one street as a scenic entry corridor and requiring special-use permits for billboards there, with the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) required to apply specific traffic-safety and visual-impact criteria under the Twin Falls Zoning Code (TFZC) before issuing a permit. When Idaho Outdoor (plaintiff) applied for a permit for a large 12-by-24-foot billboard on that corridor, P&Z staff found it larger than existing signs and inconsistent with the area's character, leading first P&Z and then, on appeal, the City Council to deny the permit for failing the TFZC's visual-impact and aesthetic criteria. Idaho Outdoor then appealed to the district court, which reversed, finding the TFZC's aesthetic criteria too vague and lacking objective standards to survive commercial-speech scrutiny, and ordered the City to issue the permit; the City appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a zoning ordinance may be based on aesthetic considerations without constituting an unconstitutional prior restraint on commercial free speech.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases