Kumho Tire Company, Ltd. v. Carmichael
United States Supreme Court
526 U.S. 137 (1999)
Patrick Carmichael (plaintiff) was driving a minivan when a tire manufactured by Kumho Tire Company (defendant) blew out, killing one passenger and injuring others; Carmichael sued alleging the tire was defective. His engineering expert, Dennis Carlson, testified he could distinguish defect-caused blowouts from abuse-caused ones based on four symptoms of tire abuse, at least two of which he said must be present to indicate abuse; Carlson found all four symptoms present in his inspection but not to a significant degree, and concluded the blowout resulted from a defect rather than abuse. Kumho sought to exclude Carlson's testimony under the preliminary reliability test from Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and the district court agreed, finding Carlson's methodology unreliable; the Eleventh Circuit reversed, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Whether the factors used in determining whether scientific knowledge of an expert witness is admissible under Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. apply to all expert testimony.