Kelly v. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co.
United States District Court for the Southern District of California
734 F.Supp.2d 1085 (S.D. Cal. 2010)
Kelly (plaintiff) received disability benefits from Provident (defendant) for thirteen years before Provident, suspecting fraud, informed law enforcement and later admitted Kelly had actually disclosed his ongoing work activity and provided business records all along; Provident then terminated his benefits and sued him for fraud. After a default judgment was entered against him during settlement talks, Kelly began drinking heavily and considering suicide, and ultimately settled by forfeiting his disability claim in exchange for dismissal. Kelly later sued to rescind that settlement, arguing he lacked the mental and emotional capacity to handle the litigation, supported by expert testimony that he suffered from Avoidant Personality Disorder making him unusually susceptible to pressure; Provident moved for summary judgment.
Whether a finding of undue influence in a transaction is based on the entire context of interactions between the parties.