Lawwly

Keller v. State Bar of California

United States Supreme Court

496 U.S. 1 (1990)

Relevant factsFree

Membership in the State Bar of California (defendant) is mandatory to practice law in the state, and the Bar used mandatory member dues to fund political and ideological activities often unrelated to regulating the legal profession. Keller and other members (plaintiffs) disagreed with much of that ideology and sued, claiming the compelled financing of political activity violated their First Amendment rights. The California Supreme Court ruled for the Bar, reasoning that as a regulated state agency it could spend dues on anything within its statutory authority, and the plaintiffs appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a non-governmental agency's use of compulsory dues to finance political and ideological activities that certain members disagree with violates those members' free speech rights.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases