J.J. Brooksbank Co. v. Budget Rent-a-Car Corp.
Minnesota Supreme Court
337 N.W.2d 372 (1983)
J.J. Brooksbank Co. (Brooksbank) (plaintiff) entered a 1962 licensing agreement with Budget Rent-a-Car Corp. (Budget) (defendant) under which Brooksbank operated a Budget franchise and received free customer referrals - about one-third of its total business - from Budget's telephone reservation system covering Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles. After Budget replaced that system with a centralized computer registration system in 1970, it argued its free-referral obligation was limited to the old telephone system and no longer applied; Brooksbank insisted it was still entitled to all referrals under the original agreement. Brooksbank brought a declaratory judgment action, and the trial court held it was entitled only to a ten percent reduction in referral costs under the new system, prompting its appeal.
Whether a contract may be interpreted by considering the parties' conduct during the course of performance to support inferences as to the meaning of the contract's language or the parties' intentions regarding gaps or omissions.