Lawwly

Innovention Toys, LLC v. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

637 F.3d 1314 (Fed. Cir. 2011)

Relevant factsFree

Innovention Toys (plaintiff) patented a physical, chess-like strategy board game using refracted laser beams, and sued MGA Entertainment (defendant) for infringement after MGA created a similar game; MGA countersued that Innovention's patent was obvious in light of Laser Chess, a prior electronic computer game using virtual lasers in similar chess-like strategy gameplay. The district court found Laser Chess was not "analogous art" for obviousness purposes because it was an electronic game rather than a physical one like Innovention's, and granted Innovention summary judgment; MGA appealed.

IssueFree

Whether prior art outside a claimed design's field of endeavor can nonetheless qualify as analogous art for obviousness purposes.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases