Lawwly

In re Kmart Corporation

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

359 F.3d 866 (2004)

Relevant factsFree

Upon filing Chapter 11, Kmart (plaintiff/debtor) sought and received a bankruptcy court order letting it pay 'critical vendor' prepetition claims in full, reasoning that unpaid vendors would stop supplying merchandise and jeopardize reorganization; the order, entered on scant evidence and without notice to noncritical vendors, gave Kmart unilateral discretion over which vendors to pay, and Kmart ultimately paid roughly $300 million to 2,330 vendors, funded partly by new financing, with its largest payment going to Fleming Companies under a long-term supply contract. Around 2,000 vendors deemed noncritical received only about 10 cents on the dollar, mostly in reorganized-company stock; vendor Capital Factors (defendant) appealed the critical-vendors order immediately, and about 14 months later, after the critical vendors had already been paid, the district court reversed the bankruptcy court, finding no statutory or doctrine-of-necessity basis for the order, and Kmart appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a bankruptcy court may give a debtor-in-possession unilateral discretion to pay certain prepetition claims in full based solely on the debtor's allegation that nonpayment would jeopardize reorganization.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases