Lawwly

Hunt v. Perkins Machinery Co., Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

226 N.E.2d 228 (1967)

Relevant factsFree

Hunt (plaintiff), a fisherman, bought a Caterpillar diesel engine through Perkins Machinery Co. (Perkins) (defendant), signing a purchase order whose front referenced "TERMS AND CONDITIONS" in bold capital letters without specifying they were located on the back, where 11 paragraphs (also headed "TERMS AND CONDITIONS" in bold capitals) disclaimed all implied warranties. Hunt never had a chance to read the reverse side before receiving his mailed copy of the fully executed order, and the purchase order was part of a notepad, meaning the back side wasn't readily visible at the point of sale. After the boat's engine emitted heavy black smoke and Perkins failed to fix it despite ten repair attempts, Hunt sued for breach of the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness; the trial judge denied Perkins's motion for a directed verdict based on the disclaimer, and Perkins appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a warranty disclaimer printed on the reverse side of a purchase order is conspicuous under the UCC when the front of the order references "terms and conditions" in bold capitals but never specifies those terms are on the back.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases