Lawwly

Humane Society of the United States v. Glickman

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

217 F.3d 882 (2000)

Relevant factsFree

In response to nuisance problems caused by Canadian geese in Virginia, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (defendant) developed a goose-management plan including killing the geese, despite its own environmental assessment concluding a permit from the Interior Department was needed under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), which prohibits "taking or killing" migratory birds by any "person, association, partnership, or corporation." A 1997 FWS memo, however, found federal agencies exempt from the permit requirement. The Humane Society and others (plaintiffs) sued to enjoin the plan; the district court held the MBTA applied to federal agencies and enjoined implementation absent a permit. The defendants appealed, arguing the federal government isn't a "person" that can be criminally liable under the MBTA's enforcement provision.

IssueFree

Whether the Migratory Bird Treaty Act requires federal agencies to obtain a permit prior to taking actions that harm migratory birds.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases