Lawwly

Hotchkiss v. Greenwood

Supreme Court

52 U.S. 248 (1851)

Relevant factsFree

Hotchkiss (plaintiff) sued Greenwood (defendant) for infringing a patent on doorknobs made of clay or porcelain rather than the wood or metal used in prior doorknobs; the trial judge instructed the jury that if the only difference between Hotchkiss's doorknob and existing designs was that material substitution, with every other component already known in the art, the patent was invalid. Hotchkiss appealed, challenging that jury instruction.

IssueFree

Whether substituting one known material, such as clay or porcelain, for another, such as wood or metal, in an otherwise known device renders the resulting invention patentable.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases