Hotchkiss v. Greenwood
Supreme Court
52 U.S. 248 (1851)
Relevant factsFree
Hotchkiss (plaintiff) sued Greenwood (defendant) for infringing a patent on doorknobs made of clay or porcelain rather than the wood or metal used in prior doorknobs; the trial judge instructed the jury that if the only difference between Hotchkiss's doorknob and existing designs was that material substitution, with every other component already known in the art, the patent was invalid. Hotchkiss appealed, challenging that jury instruction.
IssueFree
Whether substituting one known material, such as clay or porcelain, for another, such as wood or metal, in an otherwise known device renders the resulting invention patentable.