Lawwly

Hodges v. Johnson

New Hampshire Supreme Court

177 A.3d 86 (2017)

Relevant factsFree

David Hodges Sr. created two irrevocable trusts holding his company's nonvoting stock to benefit his wife, children, and stepchildren, naming attorney Saturley and employee Johnson (defendants) as trustees. After hiring estate-planning attorney McDonald (defendant) to serve as temporary trustee, the trusts were decanted three separate times to progressively remove beneficiaries - first the stepchildren, then son David Jr. after being fired from the company, then wife Joanne after her divorce from David Sr. - coinciding suspiciously with each person's falling-out with David Sr., and McDonald admitted at trial he "never gave the [claimants'] financial interest any consideration" in decanting. The removed beneficiaries sued to invalidate the decantings and remove the trustees, and the trial court did both.

IssueFree

Whether trustees may decant trusts without considering and treating all beneficiaries' interests equitably in light of the trust's purposes and terms.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases