Lawwly

Hill v. Colorado

United States Supreme Court

530 U.S. 703 (2000)

Relevant factsFree

Colorado's statute made it unlawful to knowingly approach within eight feet of another person near a health care facility entrance, without consent, to hand out leaflets, display signs, or engage in oral protest, education, or counseling, without regulating the content of any message conveyed. Hill (plaintiff), a sidewalk counselor offering abortion alternatives information to women entering facilities, sued to enjoin the statute as a First Amendment violation; the trial court and Colorado Supreme Court upheld it as a reasonable content-neutral regulation, and the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari.

IssueFree

Whether the First Amendment permits a state to restrict speech directed at unwilling listeners as a proper content-neutral, reasonable time, place, and manner regulation.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases