
Gustafson v. Alloyd Company, Incorporated
United States Supreme Court
513 U.S. 561 (1995)
Relevant factsFree
Gustafson and other shareholders sold Alloyd Company (plaintiff) to Wind Point Partners under a contract valuing the company using the prior year's revenue figures, which later proved incorrect; Wind Point sued under section 12(2) of the Securities Act, arguing the private sales contract was a "prospectus" containing an actionable misstatement. The district court ruled for Gustafson, the court of appeals vacated and remanded, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari.
IssueFree
Whether a document will be considered a prospectus if it is an offering of securities held out to the public.
Related cases
Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.328 U.S. 293 (1946)Securities and Exchange Commission v. Ralston Purina Co.346 U.S. 119 (1953)The Wharf (Holdings) Limited v. United International Holdings, Inc.532 U.S. 588 (2001)Securities and Exchange Commission v. Kenton Capital, Ltd.69 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 1998)SEC v. Mutual Benefits Corp.408 F.3d 737 (2005)