Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
United States Supreme Court
440 U.S. 69 (1979)
Relevant factsFree
A&P (defendant) leveraged a lower bid from Bowman Dairy to pressure Borden into an even lower second bid for supplying A&P's private-label milk, letting Borden believe it was merely matching Bowman's bid when in fact Borden's second bid was lower than Bowman's; the FTC (plaintiff) sued A&P under Robinson-Patman Act Section 2(f) for knowingly inducing Borden's unlawful price discrimination, and the court of appeals rejected A&P's meeting-competition defense because A&P knew Borden's bid actually beat Bowman's.
IssueFree
Whether, under the Robinson-Patman Act, a buyer can be held liable for inducing a seller's price discrimination if the seller has a valid affirmative defense to its own liability.
Related cases
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.441 U.S. 1 (1979)International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Daniel439 U.S. 551 (1979)British American & Eastern Co. v. Wirth, Ltd.592 F.2d 75 (2d Cir. 1979)Auerbach v. Bennett393 N.E.2d 994 (1979)Botticello v. Stefanovicz411 A.2d 16 (1979)