Lawwly

Gratz v. Claughton

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

187 F.2d 46 (1951)

Relevant factsFree

Claughton (defendant), a corporate director who already owned shares, bought additional shares and then sold some (but not all) of his holdings within six months; Gratz (plaintiff) sued under Section 16(b) to recover his short-swing profits. A special master computed those profits by looking six months before and after the relevant transactions and selecting the purchase-sale matching that yielded the highest possible profit figure.

IssueFree

Whether, in computing a director's profits under Securities Exchange Act Section 16(b), courts match stock sales with stock purchases in whatever way maximizes the profits recoverable by the corporation.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases