Lawwly

Gonzalez v. Douglas

United States District Court for the District of Arizona

269 F.Supp.3d 948 (2017)

Relevant factsFree

Under a desegregation consent decree, the Tucson school district (TUSD) launched a Mexican American Studies (MAS) program in 1998 that measurably improved academic outcomes for its almost entirely Latino students; after MAS students protested a political speech, then-superintendent Horne blamed MAS teachers without investigating the program's actual content, and lobbied for a state law banning ethnic-focused curricula that promote racial resentment or government overthrow, backed by funding penalties. Horne singled out MAS for elimination while ignoring other ethnic-studies programs, and his successor Huppenthal — who privately authored anonymous blog posts showing anti-Mexican American attitudes — enforced the maximum funding penalty, effectively forcing MAS's termination, while both officials publicized their roles in ending the program in political campaigns. Students and parents (plaintiffs) sued, alleging the statute was unconstitutional as enacted and enforced.

IssueFree

Whether anti-ethnic-studies laws enacted and enforced for political or racial purposes are unconstitutional.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases