Lawwly

Gomez v. Toledo

United States Supreme Court

446 U.S. 635 (1980)

Relevant factsFree

Gomez (plaintiff), a Puerto Rico police agent, was transferred and stripped of investigative authority after reporting fellow agents' evidence falsification, then was charged with illegal wiretapping, suspended, and discharged without a hearing before being reinstated after the wiretapping charge was found baseless. He sued the police superintendent Toledo (defendant) under Section 1983 for due-process violations; the district court dismissed for failure to state a claim, reasoning Gomez needed to plead that Toledo acted in bad faith to overcome qualified immunity, which Gomez had not done.

IssueFree

Whether a Section 1983 plaintiff must plead that the defendant public official acted in bad faith in order to state a claim.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases