Lawwly

Freed v. Erie Lackawanna Railway Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

445 F.2d 619 (1971)

Relevant factsFree

Freed (plaintiff), a railway brakeman, was injured by a train with no lookout posted on its lead car and sued Erie (defendant) under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. Erie's interrogatory answer stated the train was outside the yard limits at the time of the accident — which would have meant Erie violated the safety rule requiring a lookout outside yard limits — but at trial Erie testified the train was actually within the yard limits. The jury asked the court to clarify which answer controlled, but the court declined to answer, and the jury found for Erie.

IssueFree

Whether the finder of fact must resolve a conflict between a party's interrogatory answers and its later deposition or trial testimony by considering all of the answers together.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases