Lawwly

Fragante v. City and County of Honolulu

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

888 F.2d 591 (9th Cir. 1989)

Relevant factsFree

Fragante (plaintiff), a Filipino immigrant, scored highest on the written test for a Honolulu (defendant) civil-service clerk position requiring heavy daily verbal communication with the public, but both of his oral-interview panelists found his heavy accent made him difficult to understand, dropping him from first to third on the hiring list. Honolulu hired the two higher-scoring candidates with stronger oral communication skills. Fragante sued under Title VII for national-origin discrimination; the district court found his lack of oral-communication skills, not his national origin, explained his non-selection, and dismissed the suit.

IssueFree

Whether, under Title VII, an employer may base an adverse employment decision on an applicant's accent when the accent would materially interfere with job performance.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases