Lawwly

Fertico Belgium S.A. v. Phosphate Chemicals Export Ass'n

Court of Appeals of New York

510 N.E.2d 334 (1987)

Relevant factsFree

Fertico (plaintiff), a fertilizer trader, paid Phoschem (defendant) $1.7 million by letter of credit for a first shipment Phoschem knew Fertico needed on time to fulfill its own resale contract with Altawreed. Phoschem delivered nearly a month late; Fertico canceled the second shipment, bought substitute fertilizer from Unifert at a $700,000 premium to meet its Altawreed obligations, and separately paid Altawreed extra to accept delayed delivery. Fertico was also stuck with 15,000 tons of the late-delivered fertilizer it no longer needed (since payment had already been drawn), which it resold to a third party, Janssens, for a $454,000 profit. Fertico sued Phoschem for $1.25 million; the jury awarded $1.07 million, but the appellate court reversed, holding the $700,000 Altawreed gain and $454,000 Janssens profit should offset Fertico's damages since Fertico wouldn't have earned them but for the breach.

IssueFree

Whether gains a buyer realizes from successfully covering after a seller's breach must be deducted from the buyer's damages, when those gains could have been realized independent of the breach.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases