Essco Geometric v. Harvard Industries
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
46 F.3d 718 (1995)
Harvard Industries' (defendant) purchasing manager historically had unilateral authority to select foam suppliers and negotiate contracts; after a new president, Kruske, took over, Harvard adopted an internal (never externally communicated) policy requiring his approval for supplier decisions, though evidence showed this was a mere rubber-stamp formality Kruske never actually declined. Around the same time, Harvard's performance review of purchasing manager Gray encouraged him to take a more active managerial role; Gray then agreed to a supply contract with Diversified (plaintiff) without Kruske's approval, which Kruske later discovered and rejected, redirecting the business to a competitor instead. Diversified sued for breach of contract; a jury found for Diversified based on Gray's implied and apparent authority, and Harvard's motion for judgment as a matter of law was denied. Harvard appealed.
Whether an agent has implied authority to act in ways reasonably necessary to accomplish the purpose for which the principal granted the agent express authority.