Lawwly

Espinoza v. Zuckerberg

Delaware Court of Chancery

124 A.3d 47 (2015)

Relevant factsFree

Espinoza (plaintiff) brought a derivative suit challenging the Facebook board's (defendants) decision to approve compensation for outside directors; Mark Zuckerberg (defendant), Facebook's controlling stockholder holding over 61% of shares, did not receive the contested compensation himself but, after the suit was filed, approved it via deposition testimony and affidavit. The board moved for summary judgment, arguing Zuckerberg's after-the-fact approval constituted valid stockholder ratification cleansing the otherwise interested board decision.

IssueFree

Whether a controlling stockholder of a Delaware corporation can ratify an interested board's decision without adhering to the corporate formalities required for stockholder action.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases