Lawwly

Duff v. Russell

Superior Court of New York City

14 N.Y.S. 134 (1891)

Relevant factsFree

Russell (defendant) agreed to sing soprano for Duff's (plaintiff) opera company for two seasons, performing seven times a week, with Duff supplying costumes; the contract said nothing explicit barring Russell from performing elsewhere. At the end of the second season, Russell refused to perform for Duff and instead agreed to sing for a rival company, claiming the required tights were unhealthy - though she had worn them without complaint before, and had recently written Duff offering to perform, tights included, if he raised her pay. Duff could not find a replacement of comparable skill and reputation for the rest of the season and obtained a preliminary injunction barring Russell from performing for the rival; Russell appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a party breaching a personal-services contract may be enjoined from providing like services under another contract when the contract contains no explicit clause prohibiting such future agreements.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases