Davila-Bardales v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
27 F.3d 1 (1984)
Davila-Bardales (plaintiff), an unrepresented, unaccompanied minor under 16, admitted illegal entry and confirmed an I-213 form's accuracy at his deportation hearing, even though INS regulations barred using an unrepresented minor's admission of deportability in such circumstances; the immigration judge relied on these admissions to order deportation, and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirmed, distinguishing the I-213 form itself from the barred admissions. On the very same day, in an unrelated case, the BIA had expressed skepticism requiring close scrutiny of I-213 forms used against juveniles under similar circumstances.
Whether an agency may adopt a position in an adjudication that is significantly inconsistent with its prior statements and policies.