Lawwly

Cousineau v. Walker

Alaska Supreme Court

613 P.2d 608 (1980)

Relevant factsFree

Walker (defendant) advertised his land as containing over a million cubic yards of gravel with 580 feet of highway frontage, and had an appraiser describe the property as having a good gravel base while specifically excluding any gravel valuation from the appraisal; Cousineau (plaintiff), who bought the land specifically for commercial gravel extraction, later discovered the property actually had only 415 feet of frontage and 6,000 cubic yards of gravel, and sued for rescission, but the trial court ruled for Walker on the theory Cousineau, as a businessman, should have discovered the discrepancies himself.

IssueFree

Whether a buyer of land is entitled to rescission of the contract because of misrepresentations made by the seller where the buyer relies on the misrepresentations, the misrepresentations are material to the contract, and the buyer's reliance is justified.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases