Lawwly

Commissioner v. Tufts

United States Supreme Court

461 U.S. 300 (1983)

Relevant factsFree

A partnership (plaintiffs) built an apartment complex financed with a $1,851,500 nonrecourse mortgage, took large depreciation deductions that lowered its adjusted basis in the property to about $1,455,740, and then sold the property (with the buyer assuming the mortgage) when its fair market value had fallen to about $1,400,000 — below both the mortgage balance and the partnership's adjusted basis. The partners reported a loss based on the property's fair market value, but the Commissioner (defendant) determined the amount realized should include the entire unpaid mortgage balance, producing a substantial capital gain instead; the Tax Court agreed with the Commissioner, and the court of appeals reversed.

IssueFree

Whether the amount realized in the disposition of property subject to a nonrecourse mortgage includes the entire amount of the mortgage regardless of whether the mortgage exceeds the fair market value of the property.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases