Lawwly

Commissioner v. Banks

United States Supreme Court

543 U.S. 426 (2005)

Relevant factsFree

In two consolidated cases, plaintiffs Banks and Banaitis each hired attorneys on contingent-fee agreements, won or settled employment claims, and paid a substantial share of the recovery to their attorneys — Banks $150,000 out of a $464,000 settlement, and Banaitis's employer separately paid his attorney over $3.8 million under a fee-shifting statute. Neither plaintiff included the attorney's-fee portion in his own taxable income; the Sixth and Ninth Circuits reached opposite conclusions on whether those fee payments were taxable to the plaintiffs, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve the split.

IssueFree

Whether the portion of a money judgment or settlement paid to a plaintiff's attorney under a contingent fee agreement is income to the plaintiff.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases