Commerce Partnership 8098 Limited Partnership v. Equity Contracting Co.
Florida District Court of Appeal
695 So. 2d 383
Relevant factsFree
Commerce Partnership (defendant) hired a general contractor to improve its office building, and the general contractor hired Equity Contracting (plaintiff) to do the actual work. After the general contractor went bankrupt, Equity sued Commerce directly under an unjust-enrichment theory; at trial, Commerce tried to show it had already paid subcontractors and the general contractor amounts totaling nearly $290,000 — more than the $257,000 contract price — but the trial court excluded that evidence as irrelevant and entered judgment for Equity.
IssueFree
Whether a subcontractor may recover from a property owner under a theory of unjust enrichment.
Related cases
Florafax International, Inc. v. GTE Market Resources, Inc.933 P.2d 282 (1997)Amex Life Assurance Company v. Superior Court930 P.2d 1264 (1997)Alaska Pacific Trading Company v. Eagon Forest Products, Inc.933 P.2d 417 (1997)BMW Financial Services v. Smoke Rise Corp.486 S.E.2d 629 (1997)Lane Enterprises, Inc. v. L.B. Foster Co.700 A.2d 465 (1997)