Lawwly

Clinton v. City of New York

United States Supreme Court

524 U.S. 417 (1998)

Relevant factsFree

The Line Item Veto Act let the President "cancel in whole" specific spending items, new direct-spending provisions, or limited tax benefits after signing a bill into law. President Clinton (defendant) used this power to cancel a Balanced Budget Act provision that would have let New York keep certain federal healthcare funds; individuals who would have benefited (plaintiffs) challenged the cancellation, the district court found the Act unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court took the case.

IssueFree

Whether the Line Item Veto Act is constitutional.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases