Clinton v. City of New York
United States Supreme Court
524 U.S. 417 (1998)
Relevant factsFree
The Line Item Veto Act let the President "cancel in whole" specific spending items, new direct-spending provisions, or limited tax benefits after signing a bill into law. President Clinton (defendant) used this power to cancel a Balanced Budget Act provision that would have let New York keep certain federal healthcare funds; individuals who would have benefited (plaintiffs) challenged the cancellation, the district court found the Act unconstitutional, and the Supreme Court took the case.
IssueFree
Whether the Line Item Veto Act is constitutional.