Chicago Board of Realtors v. City of Chicago
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
819 F.2d 732 (7th Cir. 1987)
Chicago (defendant) passed an ordinance codifying the implied warranty of habitability, requiring landlords to hold security deposits in interest-bearing Illinois accounts, capping late-rent fees at $10 regardless of amount owed, permitting tenants to withhold rent for lease violations, and creating a rebuttable presumption that evictions following a tenant's exercise of these rights were retaliatory; property owners (plaintiffs) sued claiming the ordinance was unconstitutional and sought a preliminary injunction, which the district court denied for lack of a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits, and the owners appealed.
Whether a city may constitutionally codify the implied warranty of habitability and impose additional tenant-protective obligations on landlords, even if the practical economic effects of those obligations may disadvantage the tenants the ordinance intends to help.