Lawwly

Chambers v. Mississippi

United States Supreme Court

410 U.S. 284 (1973)

Relevant factsFree

Chambers (defendant) was tried for murdering a police officer. Another man, McDonald, had confessed to the murder in writing to Chambers's attorneys but repudiated the confession at a preliminary hearing and was released. At trial, Chambers called McDonald and got the confession admitted, but Mississippi's "voucher rule" barred Chambers from cross-examining his own witness to challenge McDonald's repudiation. The trial court also excluded, as hearsay, testimony from three other witnesses who would have corroborated McDonald's confession, because Mississippi's hearsay exception for statements against interest covered only pecuniary interests, not penal ones. Chambers was convicted and, after unsuccessful state appeals, sought Supreme Court review.

IssueFree

Whether a criminal defendant's due process rights are violated when the trial court bars him from cross-examining his own witness and excludes reliable hearsay statements against the witness's penal interest.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases